Instagram Suffering From Privacy Policy Woes

Instagram

Instagram (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Instagram has found itself in a spot of bother over the last few days. Recent changes to it’s privacy policy suggesting that the retro photos network may sell its users photos, has prompted drastic action from individual users and brands alike.

Realising the extent to which this new policy was unfavourable with it’s users, Kevin Systrom Instagram’s CEO, posted to the company’s blog to set the record straight.

“To be clear, it is not our intention to sell your photos” he said.

He also mentions that the company is not intending to use pictures of its members in advertising and the language used in that part of the policy will be removed to avoid confusion.

Systrom did make one concession around advertising:

“Let’s say a business wanted to promote their account to gain more followers and Instagram was able to feature them in some way. In order to help make a more relevant and useful promotion, it would be helpful to see which of the people you follow also follow this business. In this way, some of the data you produce — like the actions you take (eg, following the account) and your profile photo — might show up if you are following this business.”

This push for advertising and revenue generation is the biggest change to the terms of service since Instagram’s acquisition by Facebook for a cool $735million earlier this year.

Facebook itself is criticised to no end for every little alteration they decide to make to their appearance, or their terms of service. It’s users become very vocal during times of change (we all witnessed the apparent outrage to the forceable changing to timeline!), but few ever seem to abandon the network – where would they go?

This is what Instagram need to hope for. The company currently has in the region of 100 million users, whom have uploaded some 5 billion photos. Are these users committed enough to stay put however, or is there scope to move elsewhere? German company EyeEm could provide a more appealing photo host, or perhaps good ol’ Flickr who just released a killer new smartphone app? Only time will tell, let’s just hope Zuckerberg has a plan B if he just squandered $735 million!

About these ads

TWTW Social: Twitter Offer Forced Facebook to Pay $1bn for Instagram

Facebook and Twitter bid for Instagram

When Facebook announced they were purchasing Instagram for a staggering $1bn, the internet was left flabbergasted.

The huge price tag was apparently the result Facebook’s paranoia that Instagram would become a Twitter owned property, reports Venture Beat.

The article tells of how Twitter made “a very real offer in the hundreds of millions of dollars range”. Insatgram apparently did not sign the term sheet, thereby not tying them to a no-shop clause. This allowed Kevin Systrom (Instagrams co-founder) to approach Facebook in search of a better deal. It is reported Zuckerberg “bid just to block the Twitter deal”.

With Facebook looking to keep a hold of the photo sharing market that made the social network so successful, the acquisition of the wildly popular, hipster-photo app was certainly a smart one. Whether the valuation was the reaction to Twitter’s offer or based solely on startups own merits may never be known. In either case, things are looking pretty sweet for Instagram right now.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.